Genesis of the "NO" Logo

In history there have been two basic forms of social organization: collectivism and individualism. In the 20th and 21st century, collective variations have included socialism, fascism, Nazism, and communism. Under collectivism, a ruling class of “intellectuals”, bureaucrats, politicians and/or social planners decides what people want or what is “good” for society and then uses the coercive power of the State to regulate, tax and redistribute wealth in an attempt to achieve their desired objectives. Individualism is a political and social philosophy that emphasizes individual liberty, belief in the primary importance of the individual and in the virtues of self-reliance and personal independence and responsibility. It embraces opposition to controls over the individual when exercised by the state. The Preamble to our Constitution makes it plain that all power rests originally with the people, as individuals.
The “O” within the circle represents collectivism in its various forms. The “N” represents an emphatic repudiation of collectivism. The red, white and blue circles encompassing the “NO” are emblematic of our Republic. It is the responsibility of the individuals in an engaged and enlightened republic to limit the influence of the government, especially one that attempts to wield power outside the boundaries delineated by the Constitution.

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Cato Institute's rebuttal to Obama's SOTUS

http://www.cato.org/weekly/index.php?vid_id=205

Sunday, January 23, 2011

Inspiration from Ronald Reagan

A Time for Choosing

Messages to Washington

Democracy or Republic - What have we?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFXuGIpsdE0

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Insights into Obamacare

Maxine poses an Obamacare question! Good Question!

Let me get this straight . . . .

We're going to be "gifted" with a health care
plan we are
forced to purchase and
fined if we don't,

Which purportedly covers at least
ten million more people,
without adding
a single new doctor,
but provides for
16,000 new IRS agents,

written by a committee whose chairman
says he
doesn't understand it,

passed by a Congress that didn’t read it but
exempted themselves from it,

and signed by a President who smokes,

with funding administered by a treasury chief who
didn't pay his taxes,

for which we’ll be taxed for four years before any
benefits take effect
,

by a government which has
already bankrupted Social Security and Medicare,

all to be overseen by a surgeon general
who is
obese,

and financed by a country that'sbroke!!!!!

What the #!?%*could
possibly go wrong?


Friday, January 21, 2011

Reagan vs. Obama

This is as relevant now as it was in 1980. Where is our next great conservative spokesman?

Friday, January 14, 2011

Economic Opportunity and Prosperity

The 2011 Index of Economic Freedom

Economic Freedom is Foundation of all other Freedoms

Next Monday, January 17, is the 50th anniversary of President Dwight Eisenhower’s farewell address. The speech is most commonly remembered for President Eisenhower’s warning about the “unwarranted influence” of the “military-industrial complex,” but often left out of the story is Ike’s warning about profligate federal spending as well: “We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.” Ike went on to call for “balance in and among national programs” including “balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable.”

Thursday, January 13, 2011

The Depression You've Never Heard Of: 1920-1921

When it comes to diagnosing the causes of the Great Depression and prescribing cures for our present recession, the pundits and economists from the biggest schools typically argue about two different types of intervention. Big-government Keynesians, such as Paul Krugman, argue for massive fiscal stimulus—that is, huge budget deficits—to fill the gap in aggregate demand. On the other hand, small-government monetarists, who follow in the laissez-faire tradition of Milton Friedman, believe that the Federal Reserve needs to pump in more money to prevent the economy from falling into deep depression. Yet both sides of the debate agree that it would be utter disaster for the government and Fed to stand back and allow market forces to run their natural course after a major stock market or housing crash.

In contrast, many Austrian economists reject both forms of intervention. They argue that the free market would respond in the most efficient manner possible after a major disruption (such as the 1929 stock market crash or the housing bubble in our own times). As we shall see, the U.S. experience during the 1920–1921 depression—one that the reader has probably never heard of—is almost a laboratory experiment showcasing the flaws of both the Keynesian and monetarist prescriptions.

http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/the-depression-youve-never-heard-of-1920-1921/

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Words from Reagan

"Welfare's purpose should be to eliminate, as far as possible, the need for its own existence."
-- Ronald Reagan (1911-2004) 40th US President

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Andrew Klavan explains the #1 liberal argument

http://dailycaller.com/2011/01/11/andrew-klavan-explains-the-1-liberal-argument/

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Can Republicans Cut spending and Reform Taxes

Thoughts from the articulate House Budget Committee chairman, Rep. Paul Ryan(R-WI)

Fleeing Obama's Crony Capitalism

This past June, marking the first anniversary of the Obama Administration’s destruction of our nation’s bankruptcy code, Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels (R) warned: “The nation is not safe from crony capitalism. In the past year we’ve experienced the nationalization of the student loan industry and the passage of national health-care and financial-services regulation, each of which is rife with new opportunities for government favoritism and preferential handouts to favored corporations like Chrysler.” Our economy will never reach its full potential as long as the best way to succeed in business is to succeed in Washington.

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Ted Nugent on gun control

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_QjEL0uUgo

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Congress rediscovers the Constitution

Thus the first question the new Congress should ask of any proposed law is: Does the Constitution authorize us to pursue this end? If not, that ends the matter. If yes, the second question is: Are the means we employ "necessary and proper," as constrained by the principles of federalism and the rights retained by the people that are implied by a government of enumerated powers? In essence, the Constitution is no more complicated than that. It was written to be understood by ordinary citizens.

Monday, January 3, 2011

Jack Webb schools Obama

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRYAqekvj4I

Sunday, January 2, 2011

Rule of law in the age of Obama

The Rule of Law is often overlooked and misunderstood when constitutional issues arise. A general misconception is a law is constitutional if; Congress passes a bill and the President signs the bill into law, or the Supreme Court of the United States upholds a laws constitutionality. Not only is this wrong, it is inherently dangerous to our constitutional republic, limited government and federalism, and the protection of mans' natural rights and liberty.